| ART “4” “2”-DAY
26 February v.10.00 |
| DEATH:
1660 NEEFFS |
| ^
Born on 26 (21?) February 1821: Félix~François~Georges~Philibert Ziem,
(or Siem), French painter, specialized in Veniscapes,
who died on 11 November 1911 {at 11:11:11 ?}. — He studied architecture at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts in Dijon until he was expelled in 1838 for unruly behavior. In 1839 he left for Marseille, where he was Clerk of Works on the construction of the Marseille canal. In November 1839 he was noticed by Ferdinand Philippe, Duc d’Orléans, who accepted two watercolors that Ziem presented to him and commissioned a further six. This first success decided Ziem’s vocation, and he started a drawing class that was attended by Louis Auguste Laurent Aiguier [1819–1865] and Adolphe Monticelli. During this period he also encountered the Provençal artists Émile Loubon [1809–1863], Prosper Grésy [1804–1874] and Gustave Ricard. LINKS –- Venise (54x81cm; 288kb) — The Market (_ ZOOMable) — Grand Canal, Venise (55x88cm) — Le coup de canon (69x112cm) — On the banks of the Bosphorus (45x77cm) — On the Venetian Lagoon — Gloire de Venise (55x77cm) — Campement (84x115cm) — Constantinople (56x81cm) — Constantinople au Soleil Couchant (69x112cm) — Le Pont de bois à Venise — (43x63cm) — Scène Venétienne (69x95cm) — Un Port Oriental (23x28cm) — Venise, Le Grand Canal (68x107cm) — In Harbor (75x100cm) — Harbor at Constantinople (1886; 523x912pix, 162kb) — La Tour Penchée de San Pietro à Venise (54x84cm; 437x699pix, 48kb) —(070225) |
| ^
>Born on 26 February 1915: José
Raúl Anguiano Valadez, Mexican critical realist painter,
draftsman, sculptor, muralist, and engraver, who died on 13 January 2006. Anguiano, born in Guadalajara, Jalisco, developed a portentous work in his beginnings; was medullary part of the movement “Jóvenes Pintores de Jalisco”, cofounder of the Salón de la Plástica Mexicana and of the Escuela Nacional de Pintura y Escultura La Esmeralda, also cofounder of the Taller de la Gráfica Popular and member of the League of Revolutionary Writers and Artists. His initial work was based in a realistic mexican vision that touched in moments the universe of dreams; without concessions, the young Anguiano created works worthy of recognition as the legacy of a great master and The Thorn is a forceful example. Already in his last years, the master Anguiano has led to a work that is far from his original plastic motivations. — He started drawing cubist pictures at the age of 5, taking as his first models movie stars, as Mary Pickford, Pola Negri and Charlie Chaplin. His first artistic influence or aesthetic emotion came from The Holy Family by Rafael Sanzio. At the age of 12, Anguiano attended Guadalajara's Free School of Painting as a student of Ixca Farias. From 1928 to 1933, he studied under the Master painter José Vizcarra, the disciple of Santiago Rebull and José Salomé Piña, and organised the group Young Painters of Jalisco with other artists. During this period, Anguiano worked with different kinds of models: workmen, employees and a few intellectuals like Pita Amor. In 1934 Anguiano moved to Mexico City. He began teaching in primary schools and taught drawing and painting at La Esmeralda academy and the UNAM School of Art. Anguiano is member of the Mexican Artistic Renaissance movement which was started in the 1920's by the Mexican School of Art in which he belonged. This renaissance began with the San Carlos Academy movement -- among whose leaders were Ignacio Asúnsolo and José Clemente Orozco -- and which emerged out of the students’ and teachers’ discontent with the traditional paintings methods (academicism), and the close contact that the young artists had with the problems of Mexico and its people, explaining the marked critical realism to the painters of the time, including Anguiano himself. The same year, Anguiano received a commission to paint his first mural, Socialist Education, a 70-meter fresco. Other works followed, including Mayan rituals (oils on canvas and wood) and Trilogy of Nationality (acrylic on canvas and wood). In 1936 he moved into his surrealist period, which lasted almost a decade. He painted circus performers and prostitutes. The most notable among his works of the time are: The Madame (1936), The Clown's Daughter (1940), the Pink circus artist and the Grey circus artist (1941). Also during this period, Anguiano produced a series of drawings based on his dreams, with cold tones and silver-grays predominating. In 1937 Anguiano joined the Revolutionary Writers and Artists League. Together, with Alfredo Zalce and Pablo O'Higgins, he was also a founding member of the Popular Graphics Workshop, where artist practised a graphic style based on Mexico's folk traditions. This was due to the powerful influence of the recently discovered José Guadalupe Posada and Goya. Raúl Anguiano belonged to the so-called "Third Generation" of post-revolutionary painters, along with Juan O'Gorman, Jorge González Camarena, José Chávez Morado, Alfredo Zalce, Jesús Guerrero Galván and Julio Castellanos, all known for being unorthodox, associated in politics and in art, while at the same time, holding to certain traditional canons. Anguiano's work is viewed as an expression of its time because of its undeniably Mexican flavour, and the link to his people is clear, not only in his murals but also on canvas, etchings, pencil and ink drawings, lithographs and illustrations, and also more recently in sculpture and ceramics. Without compromising his personality or ethnic roots, and at the same time not allowing them to limit him, Anguiano has vindicated and taken advantage of the principles of modern art, giving him a universal and transcending character of his boundary work. — Photo of Anguiano (542x811pix, 40kb) before a Crucifixion mural in progress. –- Pescadores (Nov 1961, 70x50cm; 900x655pix, 46kb _ .ZOOM to 1800x1309pix, 134kb) — Mujer Pensativa (1976; 50x45cm plus empty space making it 50x70cm; 514x463pix, 455kb) — Muchacha de Juchitán (1974, 61x91cm; 440x640pix, 40kb) — El Rebozo (1983 3-color lithograph, 80x58cm; 440x323pix, 59kb) The Thorn (1966, 110x159cm) _ This is a work that with masterful stroke, attests the life of the lacandones in the jungle of Chiapas; work accomplished in acrylic on canvas, presents an Amerindian with knife in hand who is taken a thorn from the sole of the foot, the environment is that of desolation and leads the spectator to sense a precarious feeling in which live these indigenous of Mexico. As the background we can observed a devastated jungle, the large tree stumps show the destructive hand of man that is going leveling his environment. This work is a judgment about the presence of man as a destructive element of an unrepeatable planet. — Head of a Woman (1978 drawing, 63x50cm; 648x512pix, 158kb) —(100113) |
| ^
Born on 26 February 1836: Elihu
Vedder, in Rome, US Symbolist
painter, illustrator, sculptor, and writer, who died on 29 January 1923.
— He studied under Tompkins Harrison Matteson in Shelbourne, NY, and went to Paris in March 1856. After eight months in the studio of François-Edouard Picot, he settled in Florence until the end of 1860. There he learnt drawing from Raffaello Bonaiuti, became interested in the Florentine Renaissance and attended the free Accademia Galli. A more significant artistic inspiration came from the Italian artists at the Caffè Michelangiolo: Telemaco Signorini, Vincenzo Cabianca [1827–1902] and especially Nino Costa [1827–1902]. This group sought new and untraditional pictorial solutions for their compositions and plein-air landscapes and were particularly interested in the experiences of Gustave Courbet and the Barbizon painters. They became known as Macchiaioli for their use of splashes (macchia) of light and shadows and for their revolutionary (maquis) attitude to prevailing styles. Among Vedder’s most notable Florentine landscapes are Mugnone Torrent near Fiesole and Le Balze, Volterra; he also made many sketches, drawings and pastels of the Tyrrhenian coast, Lake Trasimene, the Roman Campagna, Egypt and Capri, which exemplify the realistic approach to landscape practiced by the artists of the Macchiaioli. LINKS –- The Sphinx of the Seashore (1879, 41x71cm; 770x1392pix, 204kb _ .ZOOM to 1541x2785pix, 741kb) –- Dominicans. A Convent Garden, near Florence (1859, 29x24cm; 1032x838pix, 68kb) –- Bed of the Torrent Mugnone, near Florence (1864; 17x41cm; 454x1165pix, 46kb) –- Death of Abel aka The Dead Abel (1869, 31x116cm; 289x1187pix, 25kb _ .ZOOM to 578x2374pix, 84kb _ .ZOOM+ to 1157x4750pix, 353kb) — Marsyas Enchanting the Hares (1899, 30x44cm; 786x1184pix, 186kb) _ According to the usual Greek version of an Anatolian legend, Marsyas found the oboe that the goddess Athena had invented. He practiced in the woods and soon wild animals came to listen. Thus assured of his skill, Marsyas challenged Apollo to a contest with his lyre. When King Midas of Phrygia, who had been appointed judge, declared in favor of Marsyas, Apollo punished Midas by changing his ears into donkey's ears. In another version the Muses were the judges, and they awarded the victory to Apollo, who tied Marsyas to a tree and flayed him. In Rome a statue of Marsyas, a favorite art subject, stood in the Forum; this was imitated by Roman colonies and came to be considered a symbol of autonomy. — The Old Well, Bordighera (1899, 49x98cm) — 39 images at ARC —(070225) |
| ^
Born on 26 February 1878: Kazimir
Severinovich Malevich, Ukrainian Cubist
painter who died on 15 May 1935, persecuted by the Soviet authorities. His
artwork was collected by Nikolai Khardzhiev, and was
plundered by crooks when Khardzhiev left the Soviet Union in 1993. —
{His name is NOT to be spelled Male-Witch.} — Malevich was born near Kiev. He studied at the Moscow Institute of Painting, Sculpture, and Architecture in 1903. During the early years of his career, he experimented with various Modernist styles and participated in avant-garde exhibitions, such as those of the Moscow Artists’ Association, which included Vasily Kandinsky [04 Dec 1866 – 13 Dec 1944] and Mikhail Larionov, and the Jack of Diamonds exhibition of 1910 in Moscow. Malevich showed his Primitivist paintings of peasants at the exhibition Donkey’s Tail in 1912. After this exhibition, he broke with Larionov’s group. In 1913, with composer Mikhail Matiushin and writer Alexei Kruchenykh, Malevich drafted a manifesto for the First Futurist Congress. That same year, he designed the sets and costumes for the opera Victory over the Sun by Matiushin and Kruchenykh. Malevich showed at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris in 1914. At The Last Futurist Exhibition in Petrograd in 1915, Malevich introduced his non-objective, geometric Suprematist paintings. In 1919, he began to explore the three-dimensional applications of Suprematism in architectural models. About 1914, after two years of painting in a Cubo-Futurist style, Malevich began to work in an abstract style, which he called Suprematism. For Malevich, the guiding principle of Suprematism was “the supremacy of pure sensation in creative art,” best represented by the square, which he considered the most elementary, basic, and thus supreme formal element; but he increasingly combined the square with the circle, other geometric shapes, and even curved lines. He began by limiting himself in his Suprematist paintings to black, white, gray, and red, but he expanded his palette as his compositions became more complex. Malevich, like other artists of his time, believed that the external world could no longer serve as the basis for art, which had, instead, to explore pure non-objective abstraction in the search for visual analogues to experience, both conscious and unconscious. As he wrote in 1915, “Nothing is real except sensation . . . the sensation of non-objectivity.” He first showed his Suprematist works at The Last Futurist Exhibition in St. Petersburg in December 1915. The exhibition, which included a broad sampling of then-current tendencies in Russian avant-garde painting, has become famous for inaugurating the two directions that would largely govern artistic production in Russia (including architecture, graphic design, theater, and the decorative arts) for the next seven years: Suprematism, and the closely related (although more socially oriented) movement Constructivism [more]. Other artists affiliated with Suprematism include Ilya Chashnik, Ivan Kliun, El Lissitzky [23 Nov 1890 – 30 Dec 1941], Liubov Popova, Ivan Puni, Aleksandr Rodchenko, Olga Rozanova, Nikolai Suetin, and Nadezhda Udaltsova. Following the Russian Revolution in 1917, Malevich and other advanced artists were encouraged by the Soviet government and attained prominent administrative and teaching positions. Malevich began teaching at the Vitebsk Popular Art School in 1919; he soon became its director. In 1919–20, he was given a solo show at the Sixteenth State Exhibition in Moscow, which focused on Suprematism and other non-objective styles. Malevich and his students at Vitebsk formed the Suprematist group Unovis. From 1922 to 1927, he taught at the Institute of Artistic Culture in Petrograd, and between 1924 and 1926 he worked primarily on architectural models with his students. In 1927, Malevich traveled with an exhibition of his paintings to Warsaw and also went to Berlin, where his work was shown at the Grosse Berliner Kunstausstellung. In Germany, he met Jean Arp [16 Sep 1886 – 07 Jun 1966], Naum Gabo, Le Corbusier, and Kurt Schwitters [20 Jun 1887 – 08 January 1948] and visited the Bauhaus, where he met Walter Gropius. The Tretiakov Gallery in Moscow gave Malevich a solo exhibition in 1929.
Using the pretext of Malevich's connections with German artists, Soviet
authorities, who repressed any non-realist art, arrested him in 1930 and
destroyed many of his manuscripts. In Malevich's final period, he was forced
to paint in a representational style. Malevich died Leningrad. This artwork had been among the Russian avant-garde artwork and writings collected by Nikolai Khardzhiev [1903-1996], which, when he left the Soviet Union in 1993, was plundered by corrupt officials, confidence men, and crooked art dealers. Malevich died in poverty in Amsterdam, where the Stedelijk Museum has the best collection of his work, acquired, as by other museums and collectors, under questionable circumstances. [1933 photo: Malevich, left, with Khardzhiev, in Moscow >] LINKS Self Portrait (1933, 73x66cm) An Englishman in Moscow (1914, 88x57cm) The Aviator (1914, 125x65cm) Complex Presentiment: Half-Figure in a Yellow Shirt (1932, 99x79cm). — Morning in the Village after Snowstorm (1912, 81x81cm) _ The paintings of the Russian avant-garde have, in general, elicited two types of interpretation: one focuses on issues of technique and style; the other concentrates on social and political issues. The former method is usually applied to Kazimir Malevich’s early paintings, grounded as they are in the forms of Cubism, Futurism, and other contemporaneous art movements; the latter largely avoids Malevich in favor of more politically engaged artists such as El Lissitzky, Aleksandr Rodchenko, and Vladimir Tatlin. From the formalist’s standpoint, Morning in the Village after Snowstorm is, in its mastery of complex colors and shapes, a perfect example of the newly created Russian style, Cubo-Futurism. The figures have been called a continuation of the genre types Malevich portrayed in his Neo-primitive paintings, their depiction seemingly reliant on Fernand Léger’s work, which Malevich could have known from an exhibition in Moscow in February 1912 or through reproductions. This phase in Malevich’s career has been seen as his formidable stopover on his journey toward abstraction and the development of Suprematism. But to ignore the political and social dimensions of Malevich’s art would be a disservice. Malevich came from humble circumstances and it is clear in autobiographical accounts that vivid memories of his country childhood compensated for his lack of a formal art education. Morning in the Village after Snowstorm demonstrates that his hard-won skills as a sophisticated painter were rooted in an unmistakably Russian experience. If art can be said to augur the future, then Malevich’s repeated decision—on the brink of the October Revolution—to depict peasants cannot have been merely coincidental. — Untitled [RFD mailbox?] (1916, 53x53cm) _ Kazimir Malevich proposed the reductive, abstract style of Suprematism as an alternative to earlier art forms, which he considered inappropriate to his own time. He observed that the proportions of forms in art of the past corresponded with those of objects in nature, which are determined by their function. In opposition to this he proposed a self-referential art in which proportion, scale, color, and disposition obey intrinsic, nonutilitarian laws. Malevich considered his non-objective forms to be reproductions of purely affective sensations that bore no relation to external phenomena. He rejected conventions of gravity, clear orientation, horizon line, and perspective systems. Malevich’s units are developed from the straight line and its two-dimensional extension, the plane, and are constituted of contrasting areas of unmodeled color, distinguished by various textural effects. The diagonal orientation of geometric forms creates rhythms on the surface of the canvas. The overlapping of elements and their varying scale relationships within a white ground provide a sense of indefinitely extensive space. Though the organization of the pictorial forms does not correspond with that of traditional subjects, there are various internal regulatory principles. In the present work a magnetic attraction and repulsion seem to dictate the slow rotational movement of parts. — Red House (1932, 63x55cm; 578x491pix, 25kb) — Black Circle (105x105cm; 543x541pix, 10kb) _ This ridiculously simplistic picture, which could appeal only to the greater fools, has been countered by the elaborately colorful Plaque Circus aka Ball Lab (2006; 707x1000pix, 322kb _ ZOOM to 1000x1414pix, 817kb) of the pseudonymous Pochtipaz Lenientovich Machoviedma. — 112 images at RAG —(060211) |
| ^
Died on 26 February 1660: Peeter
Neeffs I (or Neefs, Nefs), Flemish painter specialized in
Religious Subjects, born in 1578. He studied under Hendrik van Steenwyck II and was active in Antwerp. Most of his pictures are interiors of Gothic churches, some of them night scenes illuminated by artificial light. They are generally small, painted on copper, and executed in a precise, neat way, similar in style to those of the Steenwycks. His son, Pieter Neefs the Younger [1620->1675] painted the same subjects and it is very difficult to distinguish between their hands. Another son, Lodewijk [1617–] was also a painter, but little is known of his work. LINKS Interior of a Gothic Church (781x1107pix, 164kb)_ The Steenwijck tradition of painting church interiors was continued in Antwerp by the Flemish painters Pieter Neeffs the Elder, who entered the Antwerp guild in 1609 and died in 1660, and his son Pieter Neeffs the Younger, their hands often are virtually indistinguishable. Neeffs the Elder, however, made one innovation; he can be credited with popularizing church interiors seen by night dramatically illuminated by one or two sources of artificial light. a different, though very similar Interior of a Gothic Church (503x708pix _ ZOOM to 1258x1770pix, 388kb) a quite different Interior of a Gothic Church (611x800pix, 169kb) Interior of a Church (1619; 600x857pix _ ZOOM to 1400x2000pix, 695kb) — Interior of Antwerp Cathedral at Night (1638, 39x50cm; 635x800pix, 76kb _ ZOOM to 1274x1606pix, kb) _ 2/3 of the picture is in deep shadows. Left foreground, in the part that is lit (much more than warranted by the torch carried by a man and a candle on the nearest pillar), there is a priest guiding two gentlemen, a dog running ahead of them. — Interior of the Cathedral at Antwerp (410x600pix, 80kb) in daytime. There are people and a dog, not running. — Interior of a Church, inspired by the Antwerp Cathedral (1644, 89x112cm) _ See the very similar Interior of a Church, inspired by the Antwerp Cathedral (116x182cm) by Hendrick van Steenwyk II. — Pillared Hall (514x833pix _ ZOOM to 1284x2082pix, 366kb) with a man entering with a torch in the left hand and brandishing a sword with the right hand, two men playing chess on an oversized board, a man wrapped in a cloak sleeping seated on the floor near them, and various other figures, such as two seated beggars, one of them with a semi-transparent left leg, a man carrying a heavy sack past them, another about to run into, unawares, the sword brandisher; and a man warming himself by a fireplace. —(060225) |
| ^
Born on 26 February 1802: Victor-Marie
Hugo, French author who was also an artist. He died on 22
May 1885. HUGO THE AUTHOR AT HISTORY 4 TODAY That titan of Romanticism who is now best known as the author of Les Misérables and Notre-Dame de Paris, spewed out thousands of pages of plays, verse, novels, criticism and political, social and philosophical essays throughout his career. Few connoisseurs outside of France have realized that he also spewed out drawings about 4000 of them. Hugo the artist was as big a dynamo as Hugo the litterateur. He produced only works on paper of astonishing invention, spontaneously dashing them off in dark brown or black pen-and-ink wash, sometimes with touches of white and rarely with color. Most are small, and date from the 1850s and 1860s. Not surprisingly from an author, Hugo was expert at tapping into the unconscious. His otherworldly "Planet" drawings immediately bring to mind Odilon Redon. Other works are Romantic outpourings that can seem more than a little weird on closer inspection. These dark and wind-whipped landscapes and/or brooding castles, cells, and escarpments occupy an ambiguous space made more unsettling by quick shifts in scale and undecipherable figures in the distance. Perhaps more shocking to the contemporary viewer are Hugo's proto-Surrealist use of automatic techniques and his proto-Abstract Expressionist experiments with tache and free brushwork. To keep his art fresh, he would cheerfully experiment with his children's stencils, ink blots, puddles and stains, lace impressions, "pliage" or folding (i.e. Rorschach blots), "grattage" or rubbing, using match sticks or his fingers instead of pen or brush, and even toss in coffee or soot to get the effects he wanted. It seems that some drawings were made with his left hand or while not looking at the page. His Mushroom (1850), for example, has a sickly, poisonous cast from sparingly applied orange and green. This monumental fungus looms over a landscape like something that crawled out of a recently nuked field. Radical shifts of scale, a plethora of textural effects and various layerings of ink wash make this surreal vision endlessly haunting. The work is a technical tour de force, done with pen and brown ink-wash, black ink and crayon, white gouache, reserves and a stencil, watercolor, and by partly scraping and rubbing the sheet and by dabbing it with his fingers. Lyrical abstractions, mystical nether worlds, and vaguely limned castles, landscapes, seascapes, all aswirl in tempests or eerie in moonlight, plus architectural motifs and even calling cards were churned out by Hugo with the same spontaneity of the pen and brush that he employed for his writings. They convey a turbulent search for meaning beyond the ordinary, as do Hugo's literary works. Hugo would turn from writing to art, whenever sentences eluded him, often using the end of his quill pen to start a drawing. His art kept helped to keep his words flowing, while his love of words fed his art. Beside labeling and inscribing drawings, Hugo would at times incorporate words as formal elements. The latter is often the case in his ornately handmade calling cards, like a 1855 effort with the letters of his name forming a stand for a drawing of a landscape with castle, all this hovering in the center of a sheet saturated in brown ink with some ghostly white clouds. Many of his calling cards were created as gifts to visitors and friends while he was in political exile from France (1855-1870) and living in the English Channel Islands. His drawings, originally a sideline, became much more to Hugo shortly before his exile. He stopped writing to become more involved in politics and turned to drawing as his exclusive creative outlet during the period 1848-1851. In 1853, he became interested in séances, or "table-turning." It wasn't long before Hugo quit, but not before he realized how effective those sessions were in setting free his unconscious. His artwork became much more experimental from that time forward. Hugo considered himself a true artist, keeping his most radical works to himself. Although he tried to hide his art from the public, he shared his drawings with family and friends. Some people did see at least a few of his works, and they garnered favorable comments from many artists (van Gogh liked them) and were fought over by his admirers. In his will, he left the many in his possession to the Bibliothèque Nationale. Hugo may have been right to fear that his art, if known by the public, would overwhelm his fame as a literary giant. While much of Hugo's output of words is all but unreadable today, it is hard to imagine his drawings would ever be considered dull. LINKS Octopus with the initials V. H. (1866) Planète (1854) Tache d'encre légèrement retouchée sur papier plié (1857) Landscape with Castle (1848, 12x20cm) L'Éclair (1868, etching 22x13cm, facing L'Éclair by Hugo's friend Paul Meurice) |
![]() |
![]() |