ART 4
2-DAY 10 December
v.7.a0 |
| BIRTH:
1867 ROUSSEL — BAPTISM:
1610 VAN OSTADE |
| ^
Died on 10 December 1884: Jules Bastien~Lepage,
born on 18 (01?) November 1848, French painter of rustic outdoor genre scenes
widely imitated in France and England. — Bastien-Lepage studied under Alexandre Cabanel, first exhibited at the Paris Salon of 1870, and won a medal at the Salon of 1874 for Spring Song, which stylistically owes a little to Édouard Manet. Les Foins (1878) follows in the tradition of Jean-François Millet and reveals the sentimental element that characterizes Bastien-Lepage's work. Joan of Arc Listening to the Voices which represents Joan as a Lorraine peasant, typifies his subject pictures. He was also a portraitist of note. — LINKS — Autoportrait (55x46cm; 512x421pix, 40kb) — Les Foins (155x180cm; 600x656pix _ ZOOM to 1400x1530pix) _ Au XIXe siècle, les paysans sont tantôt décrits comme des brutes arriérées, tantôt comme des travailleurs purs et vertueux. Ce sont d’abord les physiocrates qui les critiquent pour l’archaïsme dans lequel ils végètent: leur passion pour la terre les détourne des investissements productifs, la routine leur fait ignorer les plantes nouvelles et les techniques modernes. Il est vrai que dans les années 1820, par exemple, les propriétés de 1 à 5 hectares représentent trois quarts des exploitations et seulement 17% de l’ensemble en valeur. Durant tout le Second Empire, les républicains fustigent ces masses ignorantes, politiquement immatures, capables seulement de jacqueries ou de votes en faveur du tyran. « Majorité rurale, honte de la France ! », s’écrie en 1871 le jeune député républicain Gaston Crémieux. En comparaison, les paysans au repos dans ce tableau apparaissent étrangement paisibles, enveloppés d’une sérénité qui se communique au spectateur. La paysanne de Bastien-Lepage reprend ses forces, hébétée, la «face rouge et suante; son regard fixe ne voit rien », comme dit le peintre lui-même. La paix de ce tableau ressortit à l’univers d’innocence et de bonté que peignent dans le sillage de Rousseau de nombreux écrivains, comme George Sand, marquée par le socialisme idéaliste de la révolution de 1848. A cet agrarisme de gauche répondra, à la fin du siècle, un agrarisme de droite inspiré par la crainte de l’industrialisation et du développement de la classe ouvrière. Dans les années 1880 et 1890, à l’heure où l’exode rural, la crise du phylloxéra, la croissance de l’industrie, la dépression économique, font peser sur le monde rural de lourdes menaces, les agrariens se mettent à défendre une paysannerie qu’ils parent de toutes les vertus. Pour les agrariens de tous bords, la ville et l’usine ne connaissent que fièvre, activité trépidante, anxiété malsaine, alors que les campagnes sont un havre de paix. La sérénité des champs et le repos sacré du paysan s’opposent à l’agitation perpétuelle qui fait de la ville un enfer moderne. Ce thème court jusqu’à La Terre qui meurt de René Bazin et au Retour à la terre de Jules Méline, ministre de la IIIe République, lequel recommandait de revenir vers «la terre nourricière de l’humanité féconde et éternelle». |
| ^
Born on 10 December 1867: Ker~Xavier Roussel,
French Nabi
painter, printmaker, and decorative artist, who died on 06 June 1944 (D-Day).
He was the brother-in-law of Edouard
Vuillard [11 Nov 1868 – 21 Jun 1940]. {Etait-il un descendant
de Guillaume Cadet Roussel [30 Apr 1743 26 Jan 1807]?
Ah ! Ah ! Ah oui, vraiment? - En tout cas ce n'est pas lui, mais Benoit
A. Côté qui, en 1996, a peint les
3 maisons de Cadet Roussel.} — While still at the Lycée Condorcet in Paris, he met Édouard Vuillard (whose sister Marie he married in 1893), Maurice Denis [25 Nov 1870 – 13 Nov 1943] and Paul Sérusier [09 Nov 1864 – 06 Oct 1927]; once they had finished their studies, they all went together to the Académie Julian, where Pierre Bonnard [03 Oct 1867 – 27 Jan 1947], Georges Lacombe [18 Jun 1868 – 29 Jun 1916], Paul Ranson [1864 – 20 Feb 1909], and Félix Valloton [28 Dec 1865 – 28 Dec 1925] were already enrolled. Dissatisfied with the teaching of William-Adolphe Bouguereau [30 Nov 1825 – 19 Aug 1905] and Jules Lefèbvre [14 Mar 1836 – 24 Feb 1911], they left the Académie in 1890, two years after they had begun to meet together as the Nabis. Roussel took part in the exhibitions at the Café Volpini in 1889 and the Le Barc de Boutteville gallery in 1891. At that time his pictures applied the rules of Synthetism outlined by Sérusier — flat planes of repeated color encircled by dark lines forming a harmonious rhythm; a typical example of his oil paintings of this period is Ma Grand-mère (1888). Like the other Nabis, he did not restrict himself to easel painting but also produced murals, stained glass and lithographs: the color lithograph L'éducation du chien, which he contributed to the anthology Amours (1892-1898) published by the dealer Ambroise Vollard, was the first of several such projects in which he developed the Symbolist character of his work. The 12 lithographs he contributed to another Vollard publication, Album de Paysages (Paris), vividly expressed the pantheist vision of nature that was to characterize his later work. LINKS — Mythological Scene (1903, 47x62cm; 575x754pix, 192kb) — Rural Festival (1913; 575x408pix, 140kb) –- L'éducation du chien (33x19cm color lithograph; 948x545pix, 39kb) — Paul Cézanne au Travail sur le Chemin des Lauves (1906 print, 600x559pix, 144kb) _ looks like a black-and-white photo. —(061209) |
| ^
Died on 10 December 1761: Johann
Georg Platzer (or Plazer), Austrian painter and draftsman
born on 25 (24?) June 1704. — He came from a family of painters in South Tyrol, taught first by his stepfather Josef Anton Kessler [–1721] and then by his uncle Christoph Platzer, court painter in Passau. In 1724 he painted an altarpiece for the church of Saint Helena in Deutschnofen. Probably after 1726 he went to Vienna, where he enrolled at the Akademie der Bildenden Künste and became a friend of Franz Christoph Janneck. Perhaps because of a stroke that impeded his work, he returned to Saint Michael in Eppan by 1755. Platzer produced a great number of small paintings, mostly on copper. He was the most important master of the conversation piece in 18th-century Austria, and his cultivated embourgeoisé public was fascinated by the virtuoso manner, lively colors and innumerable details of his compositions. According to the principles of decorum, he chose his models and style to suit the subject-matter: for historical scenes and allegories he took his models from antiquity, the Renaissance and Italian, and Flemish Baroque art, as in Samson’s Revenge. In his genre scenes and especially his conversation pieces, influences of the French Rococo and the Netherlandish cabinet painters are evident, while in his scenes of artists’ studios, such as Sculptor’s Workshop, his academic knowledge is revealed. The repeated use of architectural motifs in his work is derived from northern Italian quadratura painting. Although his work is eclectic, it has a characteristic personal touch that distinguishes it from the comparable, though calmer and less detailed work of Janneck. LINKS –- The Pleasures of the Seasons: Autumn (main detail) (877x1188pix, 134kb) _ ZOOM to full picture (1730, 38x55cm; 1354x2000pix, 318kb) –- The Pleasures of the Seasons: Winter (main detail) (865x1230pix, 128kb) _ ZOOM to full picture (1730, 38x55cm; 1363x2000pix, 276kb) –- The Pleasures of the Seasons: Summer (main detail) (862x1218pix, 119kb) _ ZOOM to full picture (1730, 38x55cm; 1359x2000pix, 268kb) –- Latona Turning the Lycian Peasants into Frogs(1730, 21x30cm; 842x1166pix, 115kb) –- Masquerade (25x36cm; 450x676pix, 48kb _ ZOOM to 676x1014pix, 65kb) _ The Masquerade is of persons in elegant costumes feasting in an interior after having taken off their masks. _ Although he was also a painter of history and allegories, it was the brilliant jewel-like colors and meticulous finish of cabinet pictures such as this whcih established Platzer's reputation as the chief exponent of the Austrian rococo, whole only serious rival was his friend Franz Christoph Janneck, whom he had met upon his arrival at the Akademie der Bildenden Künste in Vienna in 1726, and who painted a number of works in a very similar if somewhat less detailed vein. The sheer consistency of Platzer's work and the lack of dated examples makes it very difficult to establish a chronology for his oeuvre, but the high color key and the more impressionistic handling of the brush indicate that these are likely to be mature works. –- A Music Party (25x36cm; 447x676pix, 52kb _ ZOOM to 670x1014pix, 68kb) _ The Music Party is on the grounds of an italianate villa. –- Alexander the Great Receiving the Keys of Babylon from the High Priest (41x60cm; 720x1076pix, 91kb >_ .ZOOM to 1080x1614pix, 174kb) _ The subjects he chose were well suited to his clientèle which was both well-educated and part of the growing bourgeoisie, able to afford the display of its sophistication. It would have surely been familiar with stories from both Greek and Roman history and mythology. While the subject of the present painting is relatively obscure, the artist's patrons would have been able to discern the story from the addition (or subtraction) of the smallest detail. Alexander, for example is distinguishable by his plumed helmet and elaborate costume. — Merry Party on a Terrace (600x868pix) —(061209) |
| ^
>Baptized as an infant on 10 December
1610: Adriaen van Ostade, Dutch painter,
draftsman, and engraver who died on 27 April 1685. |
| ^
Died on 10 December 1475: Paolo
Uccello di Dono, Italian painter born in 1397.
{uccel di bosco?} — Florentine painter whose work attempted uniquely to reconcile two distinct artistic styles - the essentially decorative late Gothic and the new heroic style of the early Renaissance. Probably his most famous paintings are three panels representing The Rout of San Romano (1455). His careful and sophisticated perspective studies are clearly evident in The Flood (1448). By the time Paolo was 10 years old he was already an apprentice in the workshop of the sculptor Lorenzo Ghiberti, who was then at work on what became one of the supreme masterpieces of the history of art - the bronze doors for the Baptistery of the Florence cathedral, which consisted of 28 panels illustrating New Testament scenes of the life of Christ. In 1414 Uccello joined the confraternity of painters Compagnia di San Luca, and in the following year he became a member of the Arte dei Medici e degli Speziali, the official guild to which painters belonged. Though Uccello must by then have been established as an independent painter, nothing of his work from this time remains, and there is no definite indication of his early training as a painter, except that he was a member of the workshop of Ghiberti, where many of the outstanding artists of the time were trained. Uccello's earliest, and now badly damaged, frescoes are in the Chiostro Verde (so called because of the green cast of the frescoes) of Santa Maria Novella; they represent episodes from the creation. These frescoes, marked with a pervasive concern for elegant linear forms and insistent, stylized patterning of landscape features, are consistent with the late Gothic tradition that was still predominant at the beginning of the 15th century in Florentine studios and have given rise to the hope that Uccello's artistic origins may yet be found in some of these studios. From 1425 to 1431, Uccello worked in Venice as a master mosaicist. All his work in Venice has been lost, and plans to reconstruct it have been unsuccessful. Uccello may have been induced to return to Florence by the commission for a series of frescoes in the cloister of San Miniato al Monte depicting scenes from monastic legends. While the figural formulations of these ruinous frescoes still closely approximate the Santa Maria Novella cycle, there is also a fascination with the novel perspective schemes that had appeared in Florence during Uccello's Venetian sojourn and with a simplified and more monumental treatment of forms deriving from the recent sculpture of Donatello and Nanni di Banco. In 1436 in the Florence cathedral, Uccello completed a monochrome fresco of an equestrian monument to Sir John Hawkwood, an English mercenary who had commanded Florentine troops at the end of the 14th century. In the Hawkwood fresco, a single-point perspective scheme, a fully sculptural treatment of the horse and rider, and a sense of controlled potential energy within the figure all indicate Uccello's desire to assimilate the new style of the Renaissance that had blossomed in Florence since his birth. Following the Hawkwood monument, in 1443 Uccello completed four heads of prophets around a colossal clock on the interior of the west façade of the cathedral; between 1443 and 1445 he contributed the designs for two stained-glass windows in the cupola. After a brief trip to Padua in 1447, Uccello returned to the Chiostro Verde of Santa Maria Novella. In a fresco illustrating the Flood and its recession, Uccello presented two separate scenes united by a rapidly receding perspective scheme that reflected the influence of Donatello's contemporary reliefs in Padua. Human forms in The Flood, especially the nudes, were reminiscent of figures in Masaccio's frescoes in the Brancacci Chapel (c. 1425), perhaps the most influential of all paintings of the early Renaissance, but the explosion of details throughout the narrative again suggests Uccello's Gothic training. More than any other painting by Uccello, The Flood indicates the difficulties that he and his contemporaries faced in attempting to graft the rapidly developing heroic style of the Renaissance onto an older, more decorative mode of painting. Perhaps Uccello's most famous paintings are three panels representing the Battle of San Romano. These panels represent the victory in 1432 of Florentine forces under Niccolò da Tolentino over the troops of their arch rival, Siena. There are Renaissance elements, such as a sculpturesque treatment of forms and fragments of a broken perspective scheme in this work, but the bright handling of color and the elaborate decorative patterns of the figures and landscape are indebted to the Gothic style, which continued to be used through the 15th century in Florence to enrich the environments of the new princes of the day, such as the Medici, who acquired all three of the panels representing the rout of San Romano. Uccello is justly famous for his careful and sophisticated perspective studies, most clearly visible in The Flood, in the underdrawing (sinopia) for his last fresco, The Nativity, formerly in S. Martino della Scala in Florence, and in three drawings universally attributed to him that are now in the Uffizi. These drawings indicate a meticulous, analytic mind, keenly interested in the application of scientific laws to the reconstruction of objects in a three-dimensional space. In these studies he was probably assisted by a noted mathematician, Paolo Toscanelli. Uccello's perspective studies were to influence the Renaissance art treatises of artists such as Piero della Francesca, Leonardo da Vinci, and Albrecht Dürer. Uccello apparently led an increasingly reclusive existence during his last years. Uccello was long thought to be significant primarily for his role in establishing new means of rendering perspective that became a major component of the Renaissance style. The 16th-century biographer Giorgio Vasari said that Uccello was "intoxicated" by perspective. Later historians found the unique charm and decorative genius evinced by his compositions to be an even more important contribution. Though in ruinous condition, they indicate the immense difficulties faced by artists of his time in taking advantage of new developments without giving up the best in traditional art. LINKS Five Portraits (1450, 43x210cm) _ This painting, attributed to Paolo Uccello, portrays five famous men, Giotto (representing painting), Uccello (representing the principles of perspective and animal painting), Donatello (representing sculpture), Manetti (representing mathematics), and Brunelleschi (representing architecture). _ detail 1: Giotto _ detail 2: supposed to be a self-portrait of Uccello. The Battle of San Romano [ Left _ Center _ Right _ Panel] _ The three paintings of the Battle of San Romano are universally attributed to Paolo Uccello. The three scenes are: Niccolò da Tolentino Leads the Florentine Troops — Bernardino della Ciarda Thrown Off His Horse — Micheletto da Cotignola Engages in Battle. Together with the stories from the life of Noah these are undoubtedly Uccello's most famous works. In all three panels the battle scene is interpreted in terms of a chaotic mêlée of horsemen, lances and horses in a desperate struggle, portrayed through an endless series of superimposed and intersecting perspective planes. As in the stories from the life of Noah in Santa Maria Novella, here too the movement which should animate the scenes appears to be frozen, as it were, by the isolation of the individual details, all realistically portrayed. See, for instance, the elaborate heavy armour, the leather saddles, the gilded studs, the horses' shiny coats, and of course the splendid "mazzocchi', the huge multifaceted headgear that Uccello often included in his pictures due to the specific difficulty of painting it in proper perspective. The three panels commemorate the celebrated Battle of San Romano in which the Florentines, under the leadership of Niccolò da Tolentino, defeated the Sienese led by Bernardino della Ciarda. They were intended as decoration for the large hall on the ground floor of the Medici Palace, called Lorenzo's room. The three incidents from the Battle of San Romano shown are: Left: Niccolò da Tolentino Leads the Florentine Troops _ detail Center: Bernardino della Ciarda Thrown Off His Horse _ This is the central panel of the three paintings representing the battle won by Florence against Siena allied with Visconti, the ruling family of Milan. It took place on June 1st 1432 in San Romano, half way between Florence and Pisa. The picture shows the conclusive combat between the captains of the two armies: Niccolò da Tolentino unseating Bernardino della Ciarda. Uccello's obsession with displaying his mastery of perspective (such as the long white and red lances or the exceptional horses that have rolled over on the ground) and the dramatic nature of the clash between the knights combine with his almost magical story telling. This is underpinned by the use of unreal colors and light as if describing some fabulous tale of chivalrous adventure. _ detail 1 _ detail 2 _ Particularly lovely are the background landscapes, especially in this panel, with scenes of grape harvesting and hunting. _ detail 3 Right : Micheletto da Cotignola Engages in Battle _ In this panel there is a formal subtext created by strong decorative elements, such as the tights of contrasting colors worm by the soldiers on the left, or the arrangement of the lances, which form a series of patterns and movements that echo the horses and their riders. As could be expected, foreshortening and perspective are devices favored by the artist. The landscape has been sacrificed to the action of the figures. _ detail — Adoration by the Magi (1440, 20x82cm; 520x1939pix 173kb) _ detail (750x1039pix 172kb) — Saint George and the Dragon (1456, 57x73cm; 900x1171pix, 184kb) — a different Saint George and the Dragon (1460, 52x90cm; 705x1250pix, 153kb) == Miracle of the Desecrated Host (1469, each panel 43x58cm): — (1) a woman sells the Host to a Jewish merchant (700x1227pix, 152kb) — (2) when the merchant tries to burn the Host, It begins to bleed (650x1166pix, 121kb) — (3) religious procession to reconsecrate the Host (650x1161pix, 117kb) — (4) the woman is punished and an angel descends from heaven (680x1236pix, 146kb) — (5) the Jewish merchant and his family are burnt at the stake (650x1158pix, 119kb) — (6) two angels and two devils fight over the woman's body (647x1161pix, 119 Kb) — 64 ZOOMable images at Wikimedia —(051209) |

–-
S*>#The
Lunch Guest of a cardinal (74x61cm; 900x732pix, 118kb)The Fox and the Monkey I, by Aesop |
| A Monkey once danced in an assembly of the Beasts, and so pleased them all by his performance that they elected him their King. A Fox, envying him the honor, discovered a piece of meat lying in a trap, and leading the Monkey to the place where it was, said that she had found a store, but had not used it, she had kept it for him as treasure trove of his kingdom, and counseled him to lay hold of it. The Monkey approached carelessly and was caught in the trap; and on his accusing the Fox of purposely leading him into the snare, she replied, "O Monkey, and are you, with such a mind as yours, going to be King over the Beasts?" |
![]() |
The Fox and the Monkey II, by Aesop |
| A Fox and a Monkey were on the road together, and fell into a dispute as to which of the two was the better born. They kept it up for some time, till they came to a place where the road passed through a cemetery full of monuments, when the Monkey stopped and looked about him and gave a great sigh. "Why do you sigh?" said the Fox. The Monkey pointed to the tombs and replied, "All the monuments that you see here were put up in honour of my forefathers, who in their day were eminent citizens." The Fox was speechless for a moment, but quickly recovering he said, "Oh! don't stop at any lie, sir; you're quite safe: I'm sure none of your ancestors will rise up and expose you." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |